Hall & Evans, LLC | Home
Firm Profile
Practice Areas
Attorneys
Professional Organizations
Representative Clients
Community Involvement
Diversity
News
Publications
Contact Us
Careers

Publications By Attorney:

Bryce D. Allen
Benton J. Barton
John E. Bolmer, II
Gillian Dale
Beth A. Dickhaus
Lance G. Eberhart
Alan Epstein
Robert M. Ferm
Samantha Halliburton
Steven M. Hamilton
Cathleen H. Heintz
George Koons
Thomas J. Lyons
Malcolm S. Mead
Bruce A. Menk
Lisa F. Mickley
Brian P. Molzahn
Kevin E. O´Brien
Andrew D. Ringel
Brooke Wunnicke
Devi C. Yorty
<< Previous :: Next >>

"Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Under Federal Anti-Discrimination Laws After Holowecki" by Gillian Dale, Colorado Lawyer, April 2010

Gillian Dale is an Associate with Hall & Evans, LLC. The below is an excerpt from her article published in the April 2010 issue of The Colorado Lawyer, vol. 39, no. 4.

"In Federal Express Corp. v. Holowecki, the U.S. Supreme Court resovled a split amont the circuits and ruled for the first time that a charging party can exhaust his or her administrative remedies under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) without filing a formal Charge of Discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Holowecki's approach, which has been applied ot other statutes by the Tenth Circuit, provides an expanded opportunity for a plainfiff to argue that he or she has exhausted his or her administrative remedies solely by completing intake documents with the EEOC."

"This article discusses the case law applying Holowecki and describes the Intake Questionnaire recently issued by the EEOC in response to that decision. If properly completed, the Intake Questionnaire provides charging parties with a simpler arguement that they have exhausted their administrative remedies through the EEOC, even if they never file a formal Charge of Discrimination."


Find the publication HERE

Return to Top